Evidence-driven review

Document Q&A and Compare

Ask better questions, compare faster, and answer with verifiable evidence.

Who this delivers the biggest impact for

Team leads and reviewers comparing long contracts, policies, and reports

Manual cross-document comparison is slow, expensive, and hard to trust.

Live sample output

Input: contract v1 and v2 submitted for redline review.

Reviewers verify each difference from cited pages before approval.

Step 1

Upload and process each file through the OCR + understanding pipeline.

Step 2

Execute focused prompts on one document or compare two in parallel.

Step 3

Share concise, citation-backed outputs stakeholders can validate quickly.

Use summarize and questions endpoints to power internal copilots and review assistants.

POST /api/v1/uploads/init

PUT /api/v1/uploads/direct/{key}

POST /api/v1/documents

POST /api/v1/jobs

GET /api/v1/documents/:id/outputs

Can reviewers validate answers without re-reading entire documents?

Yes. Citations map outputs back to exact pages, so evidence checks take seconds.

Is compare mode useful for policy and contract revisions?

Yes. It is built to surface the highest-impact differences across versions with clear context.

Ask better questions, compare faster, and answer with verifiable evidence.